Legal structures for employee ownership

Contents
Introduction
Company limited by shares
Industrial and Provident Society
Company limited by guarantee
Partnership
Employee Share Ownership Plan (ESOP)
Co-operatives
Share buy back
Employee Shareholding

Introduction
There are a number of legal structures that can be adopted to facilitate employee ownership. The most appropriate generally depends on factors such as the purchase price of the business, the finance that is available to the employees, the number of employees, the size of the business, and the management structure they wish to adopt.

The purpose is to explain the different options that are available. Advice should be sought on which is the most appropriate for your venture.

The process of achieving employee ownership usually involves the employees either buying the assets and undertaking of the business which employs them, (the target company) or the employees purchasing the shares in that business, directly or indirectly. There are advantages and disadvantages to each option which should be explored with advisers.

Back to top of page

Company limited by shares
A company limited by shares is the most common form of company for business purposes. Employee ownership in a company limited by shares is usually facilitated by the employees becoming the shareholders. The employees may establish a new company (Newco) to purchase the assets and undertaking of the target company. The employees may purchase the shares in the target company directly from the retiring owners. The employees may establish their own company which purchases the shares in the target company from the retiring owners. The proportion of share capital held by the employees will dictate the amount of control they have over the company as a whole as owning shares entitles the employees to vote at general meetings of the company.

In a purchase of a small company the employees may expect to own all the shares. Where the purchase price is high and there are a larger number of employees the employees may establish an employee benefit trust which also becomes a shareholder in the new company or they may seek an outside shareholder. Less frequently, the owners might facilitate a purchase by selling their shares in stages, with a majority of shares passing to employees at the beginning.

Some of the employees will usually become directors of the company, and in larger companies non-executive directors may be appointed. Retiring owners may be asked to stay on as directors for a year or so after selling the business to assist in an effective transition.

There are two common types of shares - ordinary shares and preference shares. Ordinary shares usually carry one vote for each share. Their value depends on the size of the shareholding compared with the value of the company as a whole. Preference shares have a fixed value. They usually have preferential rights to a dividend and to repayment. Preference shares are often considered as a loan in the form of shares. They are more commonly used in purchases of larger companies.

Back to top of page

Industrial and Provident Society
An industrial and provident society is an alternative structure to the company limited by shares. Although it is very similar, it being a corporate body with share capital and limited liability, a fundamental principle is that of democratic control by its members. In an industrial and provident society, regardless of the number of shares owned by a member, the society is governed on a one member one vote basis. This business option can be appropriate where the employees are anxious to ensure that the business is run on a co-operative, democratic basis. Alternatively it may be useful if the employees are taking over a social service or leisure service function of a local authority, as a not for profit body. The regulator, the Financial Services Authority, requires that the rules of the society comply with the seven co-operative principles (established by the International Co-operative Alliance) if is to be a co-operative, and examine the rules on registration to ensure this is the case. If it is to be not for profit body the FSA considers whether its constitution prevents the distribution of assets to members.

Company limited by guarantee
Sometimes a company limited by guarantee is established. A company limited by guarantee does not have share capital. It is the structure that is often used by not for profit organisations and is also used where the employees wish to establish a co-operative. Since a company limited by guarantee has no share capital its capital must be obtained from loans, grants and retained profits.

Back to top of page

Partnership
It is of course, open to the employees to form a partnership to purchase the assets and undertaking of the business, and to carry on the business as a partnership. Obviously, entering into a business as a partnership can be a risk for the partners as they are not protected by limited liability.

Limited Liability Partnerships
The Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) borrows much from the company limited by guarantee, providing some limit on liability in return for a more open disclosure with the LLP’s required to file annual returns and accounts.

Back to top of page

Employee Share Ownership Plan (ESOP)
A more sophisticated method of ensuring employee share ownership is to create an ESOP. This is the most complex of the structures that are available. An ESOP can be used in conjunction with a company limited by shares and an industrial and provident society established as a co-operative. It cannot be used in a company limited by guarantee.

There are two principal elements to an ESOP - a Share Incentive Plan and an employee benefit trust. Either can operate independently without the other. They can also be used together. A Share Incentive Plan might be more appropriately called a share distribution trust since its purpose is to put shares into the hands of employees.

A Share Incentive Plan can simply be used to incentivise employees without connection to a succession strategy. A Share Incentive Plan is allocated profits from the company which uses the money to purchase shares. The shares can be purchased from existing shareholders or by the issue of new shares. The shares are allocated to employees in accordance with a formula agreed by the company with the Inland Revenue.

As part of a succession strategy a Share Incentive Plan might be introduced by retiring owners to incentivise employees before a sale as well as to provide a mechanism for the dilution of their shareholding. It might also be introduced by the employees' own Newco so that new employees of Newco can become shareholders. It can also be used together with an employee benefit trust. A Share Incentive Plan has an obligation to distribute shares to employees. It cannot hold shares collectively on behalf of employees without distributing them. However, since 2002 it has been possible for a Share Incentive Plan to obtain a block of 10% of the shares in a company and distribute these over a period of 10 years.

An employee benefit trust is another trust whose purpose is to hold shares on behalf of employees and to facilitate their purchase or allocation to employees. It can therefore be used as part of a succession strategy in companies, particularly those with more than 10 employees. One of the differences between the employee benefit trust and the Share Incentive Plan is that the employee benefit trust can borrow monies to purchase shares from the retiring owners.

Back to top of page

Co-operatives
Co-operative ownership often appeals to employees because each shareholder has one vote regardless of the number of shares held. It is possible to structure a company limited by shares or an industrial and provident society in a democratic or co-operative way with employee shareholders benefiting from an increase and suffering any decrease in value of the shares. Alternatively the shares can always retain a fixed value. This is known as a common ownership co-operative.

A common ownership co-operative is one which is controlled by its members (in this case the employees) and the assets of the business may only be used to further the objects of the business, although members can receive a distribution of profits. On winding up, the assets must be donated to another common ownership business rather than distributed amongst the members. Common ownership co-operatives can be registered as companies limited by shares and industrial and provident societies but more frequently they are registered as companies limited by guarantee although this is less tax efficient than companies limited by shares and industrial and provident societies in profit distribution to employees.

Back to top of page

Share buy back
Once the purchase price for a business has been ascertained the purchasers need to consider how to fund the purchase. Usually it will be through a combination of money put in by the employees themselves, which they have as savings or which they borrow, or by way of a loan to Newco from a bank or other lender. Occasionally it will be through an outside investor investing in shares alongside the employees, or even the outgoing owner-manager allowing the price to be paid by instalments over time.

If the target company has been trading profitably for some years an alternative way to reduce the purchase price is for the existing shareholders to make a pre-sale dividend or re-purchase of shares. This results in a pound for pound reduction in the purchase price.

Under a re-purchase of shares a company purchases its own shares out of distributable profits. Not all the shares are re-purchased in this way, but simply an amount which uses up some of the distributable profits. The value attributed to the shares will relate to the purchase price which has been agreed. It then becomes a question of cash flow for the target company as to whether it has the cash to make the payment.

A purchaser who agrees to the cash balances of the target company being used in this way may require a working capital facility as a consequence. Alternatively, the company may need to borrow money to fund the purchase.

The owner who sells the shares of the company in this way may be subject to capital gains tax on the disposal of the shares. But this may be reduced through Taper Relief and reduced or relieved by a shareholder’s annual exemption.

Back to top of page

Employee stakeholding

The Idea
The idea that a successful company has stakeholders with which a company works to improve the business has been fashionable for several years. One of the stakeholders are the employees of a company. Other stakeholders include shareholders, customers and suppliers. The purpose of a company identifying its stakeholders is to acknowledge that a successful company needs to work with its stakeholders over a long time to ensure business success.

So far as the employees of a business is concerned a stakeholding relationship can involve:-

  • A commitment by the employer to continued training of employees to enable them to be capable of work in the company, and to have saleable skills if the company has a downturn.
  • An ongoing dialogue with the employees as to how improvements can be made in the way the company works to produce better products and services to customers accompanied by reward mechanisms for the employees' ideas.
  • The incentivisation of employees through shareholdings in the company, often known as an ESOP or employee share ownership plan.

Many of these relationships are organised through trade unions on behalf of employees.
Research suggests that companies in which the employees own shares are more profitable than companies where employees do not own shares.

Back to top of page

Employees as shareholders
Why should employees be interested in becoming shareholders in the company in which they work?

Sometimes companies will offer the shares to employees for free through what is called a profit sharing scheme. The shares can become an asset for employees which they can sell at a later date. This is the most usual route for employees to become shareholders.

Companies which are moving to a listing on the Stock Exchange often issue shares to employees on a listing or make them available for employees to buy at a discounted price.

Occasionally opportunities arise for employees moving from the public to the private sector to obtain a stake in their company. This happened particularly with the bus industry where local authority companies became private companies. Trade unions in this industry organised themselves so as to ensure that their members benefited from privatisation. Many bus companies still have employee shareholders, and some have employee directors even though the employees no longer hold a majority of shares.

Exceptionally employees may be asked to take salary cuts or other benefits, or take a wage freeze, in order to ensure the survival of a firm. This should not be done lightly or for free. Obtaining a shareholding in the company is a way of trading one's loss of benefits for the possibility of a gain in the future. Examples of this have not occurred in the U.K. but have occurred in the United Sates among some airline and steel companies.

Back to top of page

Risks
In assessing stakeholding opportunities employees need to consider whether the company is a private company or a public company whose shares are listed on the Stock Exchange. If the company is a public company whose shares are listed on the Stock Exchange there is a ready market for shares to be bought and sold. This is not the case in a private company. In a private company there may be an ESOP which provides a mechanism for an employee to sell shares. If not employees should always enquire what mechanism does the company have to sell shares.

Rewards
Since employees are to be expected to move more from one company to another building up shareholdings in a company may be a way to have a cushion against unemployment or the times between jobs, as well as being a nest egg for retirement. However, employees should always realise that the value of shares can go down as well as up.

Future Developments
It is not unusual in companies where a shareholder owns more than 15% of the shares for the shareholder to have a seat on the board of directors. With few exceptions employee shareholders are often not sufficiently organised so as to ensure that they use their shares as a block vote. It is expected that this is the type of development which trade unions will wish to take up

Back to top of page

Employee Benefit Trusts and Share Incentive Plans
The case law EBT was a mechanism which could be used for obtaining tax relief and encouraging share ownership. Unfortunately, it was used by advisers on tax planning for wealthy individuals to increase wealth for those individuals and in November 2002 the Government effectively removed the principle tax relief for the use of EBT’s to widen share ownership. Although the Employee Benefit Trust has lost its tax efficiency for companies seeking to establish collective share ownership, it is still used for that purpose by companies.

It is still worth referring to the Employee Benefit Trust in order to understand its use in transferring a business to the workforce and perhaps some day effective lobbying might reintroduce the tax relief in a way which encourages broad employee share ownership.

Back to top of page

Employee Benefit Trusts
A trust is a mechanism by which one or more persons (the trustees) agree to hold property for purposes directed by the founder of the trust. In the case of an EBT the purpose is to purchase shares in the company in which the employees work and to pass them to employees. Charities are an example of a different kind of trust.

Tax relief on payments to an employee benefit trust was based on the tax principle that encouraging the motivation of employees is an expense of the business, which may be seen as something like employee remuneration for corporation tax purposes.

By virtue of decisions of the courts over several years where a company made a payment to a trust for the benefit of employees (EBT) the payment could be deducted in the calculation of corporation tax. The first EBT’s were known as case law EBT’s.

Since there remained a degree of uncertainty whether the Inland Revenue would accept payments made by a company to an EBT as a tax deductible expense, the Government introduced its own form of EBT in 1989 which was known as a QUEST or Qualifying Employee Share Ownership Trust.

Relief for contributions to a QUEST was withdrawn in relation to financial periods beginning on and after 1 January 2003 and it is therefore unlikely they will be used much in future.

Back to top of page

The Current Situation
From November 2002 a deduction is allowed for the period in which an employee benefit contribution is made only to the extent that during that period, or within nine months after the end of it, qualifying benefits are provided or qualifying expenses are paid out of the employee benefit contributions in question.

An employee benefit contribution is defined as a payment of money or transfer of an asset to a third party (eg the EBT) who is entitled or required under the terms of the Trust to hold or use the money or asset for, or in connection within, the provision of benefits to employees of the employer.

Qualifying benefits are provided if there is a payment of money or transfer of assets (eg shares) that gives rise to both a charge to Income Tax under ITEPA 2003 and National Insurance contributions. In other words a company can get tax relief on a contribution to an EBT if the EBT pays out a taxable benefit by the transfer of shares or gift of money to an employee.

Back to top of page

Contributions to a Share Incentive Plan (SIP)
The Share Incentive Plan is the new term for the Government’s All Employee Share Ownership Plan, or profit sharing scheme which it replaced in 2001. It remains an All Employee Plan which is established by written rules and a trust. Specimen documents are available on the Inland Revenue website.

The company must ensure that the Plan is approved by the Inland Revenue before any shares are acquired by the Trustees or distributed to employees under the Plan. It can have up to four features:

A SIP may provide for the trustee to award qualifying eligible employees free shares.

Eligible employees may also permit deductions from their salary to be used to acquire partnership shares.

The trustee, if it receives relevant monies from the company, can acquire shares and make additional awards of up to two free matching shares for every one partnership share acquired.

The tax investment of dividends on plan shares may be used to acquire further shares, dividend shares, to be held in the Plan.

The purpose of this scheme is to encourage wider employee share ownership of a company. Contributions from the company to the Trust may be deducted for the purpose of calculating Corporation Tax on the profits of the trade carried on by the company.

The Trust can only use the monies which it obtains from the company to buy shares in the company and is required to distribute those shares to employees. The shares must be offered to employees on similar terms. The shares acquired under the Plan must be distributed to employees which means that it is not a vehicle for collective ownership.

Back to top of page

Acquisition of 10% Interest in the Company by the SIP
The normal rules of the SIP usually restrict it from acquiring a large stake of shares in the company because of the maximum amount of shares which can be awarded to employees under the SIP in any one year.

From 6 April 2003 a company is allowed a deduction in its liability to Corporation Tax for a contribution made to a SIP which is used to acquire shares from anyone other than a company. It is necessary under this relief for the trustee to hold shares amounting to not less than 10% of the ordinary share capital of the company at the end of 12 months from the date of acquisition of the shares. This would therefore permit payments from the company to the SIP over two financial years towards the acquisition of these shares. It is important that at least 30% of the shares acquired out of the contribution to the Trust by the company have been awarded under the SIP within five years from the date of the acquisition of the shares. All of the shares acquired with the contribution must be awarded within 10 years from the date of that contribution.

Back to top of page